{{{click on images to enlarge}}}
The key to understanding Craig Norton‘s work at Jim
Kempner Fine Art might be in answering why all these old people are so
happy. Indeed, at the show my big
question was how everyone my own age could be so miserable and stressed out
while these older folks seemed so serene and fulfilled. And, it’s not just the old folks in the
Norton show: I’ve seen this phenomenon
before.
My grandmother was a saintly woman – I never saw her
become angry and I noticed that she had the same charm and grace that the elderly
have in Norton’s show. Also, I went
through the Catholic school system in Chicago, and I clearly recall some of the
older nuns exhibiting this type of inner peace and equanimity. Sister Stanislaus, you were truly an angel of
God when you taught us math. Sister
Gertude, you are long gone, but you still have my thanks for your kind
tolerance. I guess that’s why I like
this show at Kempner so much. It’s as if
these older folks have become privy to a secret the rest of us don’t know…yet.
Their smiles and their transparent kindness and
peacefulness are so benevolent and trusting and reassuring. We younger folks think, but wait a minute –
you’ve got one foot in the grave!
Where’s your anxiety!? Where are
your regrets!? This is so
counter-intuitive! How can you be so
happy!?
So as an ex-sociology student I’ve come up with some theories
as to why old folks might be happy. 1)
Being old is like being fired from a crappy job. Deep down inside you wanted to get out, and
now you’re out and you can laugh your ass off.
Man, that job was stupid! 2) No more mindless competition. When you’re old and retired nobody even asks
you what you used to do. Only idiots don’t give you unconditional respect for
being elderly. You can relax and just be a goddamn human being for a
change. Ok, that’s enough. Those two
reasons are enough.
So another big question is: why does Norton draw faces
and hands in a very stark manner but then surround them with colorful clothing
and background features? I don’t
know. Your guess would probably be
better than mine. The lifeless stuff around
the faces and hands looks more colorful and the features that possess life are
colorless. Maybe the artist is implying
that our environment and the stuff that surrounds us is an endless source of
engagement and really the life-giving element for us. Maybe he wishes to call our greater attention
to the details of faces and hands by removing the color from them.
(Photos of me taken by an anonymous Russian guy, I'll just call him: Rustam)
As long as I’m writing about Kempner’s amazing gallery, I
would be remiss if I didn’t mention his video series ‘The Madness of Art’.
He’s been making short videos about what it’s
like to run a gallery in Chelsea and some of these are pretty dang funny. Also, I like the cameos with actual
artists. Off the top of my head, I loved
the episode where Tony Fitzpatrick strong-arms a gallery show out of Kempner
and I especially loved the episode where Robert Indiana walks into the gallery
and is mistaken for a homeless bum seeking shelter. Indiana then demands that one of his pieces be
removed from the gallery because it looks like a forgery. Now that’s funny
stuff!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.