{{{click on images to enlarge}}}
“I had returned from Spain looking for the ‘sexual
revolution’ and instead found sexual commercialization that mostly showed
female bodies for sale. I wanted to find an erotic visual language that would
speak to women. I was convinced that the repression of women began in the
sexual arena, and this would need to be addressed at the source.” Joan Semmel
To a great extent Joan Semmel, throughout her artistic
career, seems to have attacked the paradox that Naomi Wolf brought to public
attention through her work ‘The Beauty Myth’. In a society where women have
attained a great degree of economic equality, why are they so depressed and
anxious and why are they so obsessed with notions of beauty that still leave
them as male objects of desire? The more freedom and equality women gain, the
more feminine and desirable to men they seem to want to be. In her art Semmel
has aspired to present a less self-conscious sense of female sexuality through
experiments combining figurative and expressionistic elements as well as
cropped images based on photos and images containing mirrors and cameras so
that we are constantly aware of the usual ‘object’ of male art and desire
finally attempting to view herself ‘through her own eyes’.
The eye-catcher for me in this show, the piece which I
saw through the window of the gallery and which compelled me to enter Alexander
Gray Associates, is an untitled piece from 1971 of a man performing cunnilingus
on a woman. To openly distinguish the piece from any semblance of pornography,
the figures are expressionistic and portrayed in unrealistic colors. We see a man engaged in a type of selfless
aggression to bring the woman to orgasm. Indeed, that this is a deliberate and
voluntary process is revealed through the open eye looking, apparently, to see
whether the woman is responding favorably. His lust or commitment toward this
selfless sexual gesture for the woman is, also, unquestionable – he is
obviously driven and deriving immense pleasure as he performs oral sex. This
relatively early piece by Semmel, during
the early stages of the feminist movement in the USA, turns the normal
sexual power-dynamic of both art and pornography upside down. It’s an amazing
piece which, basically, modeled or hinted at, in 1971, a possible new type of
sexual relationship, or public portrayal of a sexual relationship, between men
and women.
Throughout the gallery we also see paintings of women
intertwined with lovers or alone, or even lying naked next to a lover in an
attempt to reimagine “…the nude without objectifying the person, of using a
specific body rather than an idealized form.”
Some paintings with deliberately cropped heads are of Joan herself. Heads
are deliberately cropped to connote an autobiographical perspective that
subverts the viewer’s accustomed tendency to assume the traditional role of the
erotic voyeur. In many of Semmel’s paintings of nudes we get a sense of ease
and equanimity instead of anxiety to please or conform – instead of the
idealized feminine body we get a body at peace with itself, some bodies engaged
in a meaningful emotional and sexual union with an equal and equally loving
partner.
Long before the term ‘selfie’ was created, we also see
various paintings of Semmel, camera in hand, looking into a mirror,
photographing herself as she enters a period of life and the aging process
which has been prohibited in art. When we see aging women in the Western
tradition, we recall the ‘vanitas’ paintings, warning us of the transitory
nature of life and need for greater religious commitment. Old women painted by
male artists have often warned other males that every woman is a potential hag,
female beauty is a deception and women are evil deceivers and spiritual
vampires. Semmel challenges this approach as well – she disabuses the traditional
pictorial abuse of women with a basic reality which invites fellow-feeling and
compassion for our shared human condition.
As Semmel wrote, “I wanted the body to be seen as a woman
experiences herself, rather than through the reflection of the mirror or male
eyes. The fundamental problem of subject and object was always present, and
using my own body was one method of dealing with this. More importantly, it
made it clear that the artist was female, and undercut the stereotypes of male
artist and female muse. I wanted to subvert this tradition from within.”
Do you like thoughtful essays? Read Daniel Gauss' essays on The Good Men Project: https://goodmenproject.com/author/daniel-gauss/
Buy Daniel Gauss a cup of coffee? https://www.buymeacoffee.com/danielgaus6
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.