{{{click on images to enlarge them}}}
It’s too bad nothing was done by New York City government
to try to preserve intact what was one of the greatest art gallery districts in
the world. Chelsea, as a hotbed of
contemporary art, was never going to be the tourist attraction the adjacent Highline
Park became, so it has been sacrificed to high rents and property taxes as the
Highline transforms the neighborhood into the unthinkable. Thousands of
oblivious tourists blithely walking over and past 200 free-admission art
galleries has become a potent symbol of what it means for local government to
pander to the out-of-towner for an extra buck instead of fortifying one’s own city’s
cultural wealth and power for one’s own citizens and art lovers around the
world. I’m not sure what could have been
done, but I’m guessing that when you have the richest guy in the city as mayor,
whose agenda seemed to be pricing the poor out of the city, losing the country’s
greatest, free visual arts resource would not seem to appear high on any
official list of priorities: just another example of a lack of vision by
leadership which, basically, bought its position in government courtesy of an easily
manipulable, apathetic and self-absorbed electorate.
What’s a good way, then, to ensure that the orientation
of your gallery retains a more genuine engagement between experimental artists
and viewers, divorced from the financial pressures placed on you by the
real-estate market in New York City to sell, sell and sell some more to pay
your rent and keep your space? You might try what three new gallerists recently did and get space in a grimy little basement
on the Lower East Side of Manhattan, fix it up a bit and then begin inviting
artists who still retain high degrees of integrity and enthusiasm to show work.
Indeed, Maximiliano SiƱani, Kim Junsung and Selina Lin have created, through their own sense of integrity and
passion for the visual arts, the perfect anti-Chelsea in ‘67’ the gallery
located in the basement of a building at 67 Ludlow Street on the Lower East
Side.
Apparently Douglas Rieger, one of the artists in the show
and an MFA student at Yale, has been reading about Wilhelm Reich’s theories of
self-development and especially the concept of character armor – actual
physical responses within the body that occur to suppress feelings when
individuals do not want to face challenges or address emotional states they
don’t feel they can or should handle. In
fact the title of the show ‘Basement Youth’ seems to be a type of
Reich-inspired psychological metaphor for processes involved in development,
intimacy and sexual expression or repression.
Rieger also seemed to discover that, coincidentally, “The
Basement” is a hugely popular but controversial youth ministry program begun by
a young man struggling with drug addiction, who began using the Gospel to reach
other ‘troubled’ youth, first in his basement, then throughout larger and
larger public meeting places. A basement becomes that extra ‘malleable’ space,
as Rieger described it, in the home, sort of like Erving Goffman’s concept of
‘backstage’ – the non-public public space where issues are addressed and things
worked out before an actual public performance begins. Psychologically, I am
guessing, “Basement Youth” could mean the backstage portions of our lives where
the malleable becomes, unfortunately, less and less malleable, often as a
response to social pressures, judgments, expectations, limitations etc.
Rieger’s work seems to embody both mechanistic and
biomorphic elements and he explained to me that his work is meant to depict
objects reflecting desire – but desire inadvertently or maybe deliberately expressed
through the process of mechanization and industrialism. He pointed out that in
the early stages of industrialization aspects of machines often took on sexually
suggestive or charged biomorphic forms. These days machines are streamlined and
designed to appear as asexual as possible, perhaps reflecting the ultimate
triumph of character armoring and the repression of the sexual and natural in
our lives.
Maybe this parallels what happened in the transition from paganism to Christianity - in early Medieval church architecture craftsmen often secretly planted images of ‘green men’ or pagan nature deities into the church decorations to reflect that the old beliefs and practices still survived among the workers. Later, in church architecture, these green men and deities were omitted just as sexual biomorphism as a type of subconscious or biological protest to industrialization and globalized commercialism is disappearing. Rieger’s objects seem to reflect the tension between the biological and mechanical and the extent to which economic processes and functions may have led to greater ‘armoring’ demands for our bodies, just as Christianity once demanded a more severe divorce between our bodies and nature (leading to the false dualism of body and mind). What the Christian religion could not fully accomplish, the globalized capitalist is here to finish.
Maybe this parallels what happened in the transition from paganism to Christianity - in early Medieval church architecture craftsmen often secretly planted images of ‘green men’ or pagan nature deities into the church decorations to reflect that the old beliefs and practices still survived among the workers. Later, in church architecture, these green men and deities were omitted just as sexual biomorphism as a type of subconscious or biological protest to industrialization and globalized commercialism is disappearing. Rieger’s objects seem to reflect the tension between the biological and mechanical and the extent to which economic processes and functions may have led to greater ‘armoring’ demands for our bodies, just as Christianity once demanded a more severe divorce between our bodies and nature (leading to the false dualism of body and mind). What the Christian religion could not fully accomplish, the globalized capitalist is here to finish.
Dylan Languell contributes pieces to this show which seem
to reflect the tension artists often feel between work and creation. To me he
is asking to what extent art is separated from commercial concerns or can be
separated from commercial concerns. The visual arts, if I may be completely
candid, seem to be among the most corrupt of the art forms. As a guy writing
reviews in New York City I’ve learned – and some gallery owners will tell you
this – quid pro quo rules the day. You’ve got nepotism, favoritism,
back-scratching, probably little envelopes being exchanged, ‘elite’ gallery
owners and buyers colluding to promote nobodies creating meaningless crap to
inflate prices of crap pieces to be resold to wealthy idiots etc. Art often
seems like one big con game to me, and as a conscientious reviewer I’m always
looking to find the ‘real’ art by ‘real’ artists out there, and I am always
grateful and sometimes ecstatic to find it, because it can be so rare. I think
Languell, the folks who created this new gallery, and I all believe that there
is such a thing as ‘real’ art – the challenge is to find ways to get it out
there.
So Languell takes real paint…yes, the kind of paint your
mom made you use to paint the living room. He then layers it and layers it and
layers it to the nth degree. This repetitive action ultimately results in what
might be called an emergent quality inherent in the paint itself. The paint loses its initial function and develops
its own potential for expression. So there’s a process art component of this as
the artist has to painstakingly layer the commercial paint the way On Kawara
painted individual dates each day or the way Peter Dreher wakes up every day
and paints the same drinking glass. To me this type of dedication and
perseverance is a beautiful analogue for faith. You are committed to a process,
engage in this process daily and wait for some type of often unpredictable
fruition. Languell gets an amazing fruition in his pieces – some look
leather-like, some look as if they are taken from Baroque marble sculptures of the
clothing of orgasmic saints.
Interestingly, and maybe the curators of the show
realized this, the layered paint pieces also seem to reflect a type of ‘armoring’,
but it’s like the armoring depicted in Bernini’s orgasmic saint - St. Theresa. So
it’s not an armoring to repress, but one which reflects inner florescence. Take
a look at that sculpture again by Bernini – you don’t see that woman’s body.
Bernini’s got her body completely covered in undulating cloth. It’s as if the
folds in the cloth represent the psychological wave patterns in her spiritual
orgasm. To me, Languell’s pieces represent these same types of wave patterns
that often lie locked within the paint used to create, but can be unlocked
through an arduous act of meaningful commitment by the artist. He takes a
potentially corrupt art form, one that can be readily exploited by the money
guys, and through a sense of integrity and commitment finds a way to engage
others on a deep and transformative level. This gallery is at 67 Ludlow and is
currently only open from Thursday through Saturday, 4 to 8pm.
If you wanna buy any of this cool stuff, make them an offer at: info@sixtyseven.us
If you wanna buy any of this cool stuff, make them an offer at: info@sixtyseven.us
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.