{{{click on images to enlarge them}}}
While over one million people starved to death in Ireland
from 1845 – 1850, boatloads of grain regularly arrived from Ireland, through
the port of Liverpool, to feed the citizens of England. The Irish people had
been colonized by the English and most Irish worked for various wealthy (mostly
English) landlords who never even considered stopping the transport of food
from Ireland to England so that the Irish themselves might be saved while the
potato crop was decimated by a fungus. The tenant farmers who were dependent on
the potato starved while the wealthy landowners reaped tremendous profits from
the Irish grain they exported. This was free market capitalism at its most
transparently inhumane, but it has come down to us through history whitewashed
as the potato ‘famine’. Yet, a famine is when there is no food – there was an
overabundance of food…the Irish just weren’t allowed to eat it.
John Kelly was born in England to Irish and English parents
who raised him in Australia. He now lives in Cork where the Great Hunger was
especially horrific. Discovery of a letter written to the Times of London by a
witness of the Great Hunger in his region lead Kelly to realize that no visual
record of this tragedy existed in the art of the time. Actually, this shouldn’t
have been all that surprising, since, until the French Revolution, the only
suffering in Western visual art was the suffering of Jesus, some martyrs, souls
in hell and maybe some mythological figures being punished for arrogance. Suffering depicted in art due to social or
economic or military oppression is non-existent until after the French
Revolution and, even after the French Revolution, when artists could choose
their topics for the marketplace, independent of patrons, they often chose what
would sell. Real, gut-wrenching suffering that motivates social action doesn’t
sell to art buyers.
Furthermore, the suffering depicted pre-French Revolution
was meant to awe and inspire and fill the viewer with admiration and
veneration, not a sense of outrage. This type of suffering is even, at times,
very sensual - to the point where Renaissance and Baroque suffering does not
only not encourage us to connect and empathize with victims, but, in fact, it
encourages us to become sexually aroused by them (the Japanese writer Mishima
had his first orgasm while looking at Guido Reni’s St. Sebastian). You need to
stylize and sexualize suffering in the visual arts to make a buck from it.
{{{Kelly enjoys referencing the papier-mache cows made by William Dobell in WWII, which were placed near Australian airfields to confuse Japanese pilots into thinking the airfields were really farms. This piece represents a cow stuck up a tree after a flood.}}}
Kelly’s response to all of this seems to be non-linear but
relevant and meaningful. He turns to landscape painting and the true horror to
be derived from his paintings is that no trace of the horror can be readily
found. The High and Low Islands which bore witness to the suffering on shore
look tranquil and inviting. This peace, beauty and sublimity demands, however,
a strong response. The Marquis de Sade once said, “Every death, even the
cruelest death, drowns in nature’s indifference.”
In response to this indifference
(which parallels the indifference of the English upper classes who nearly
committed genocide against the Irish), we are required to speak out and
remember the atrocities that both nature and our system of social classes tend
to swallow up or wipe away. So through these landscapes Kelly is not looking to
validate a historical record or collect and present evidence. Yet, there is a
palpable reverence and sadness and evidence of a personal act of compassion and
deep sympathy for the loss of life that has never been fully acknowledged by
the English government or our history texts. In the painting ‘Sticks
(Moonlight)’ (pictured above) Kelly references this sense of reverence by
painting what is left of artist Susan O’Toole’s site-specific sculpture ‘Tree Sentinel’
– originally 18 long tree trunks or ‘sticks’ fixed into the ground in Cork to
commemorate the Great Hunger in the early 2000s.
Indeed, if we look at the paintings themselves, this seems
to be landscape painting divested of any sense of romanticism or transcendence.
It could be argued that landscape painting is, in itself, very ‘pagan’,
hearkening back to a desire for union with Arcadia, very pre-Christian in its
orientation, shooting for something non-Christian, non-allegorical and
something that winds up on the canvas which has not been mediated through the
intellect. I would call Kelly’s work a
type of ‘secular’ landscape – the painting technique seems affected by the
knowledge of what happened on the land. You don’t have the soft blurriness characterizing
the English Romantic painters – each aspect of the landscape is clearly
delineated from other aspects…sea, sky, land…we see the landscape but might
struggle to be affected by it in the way that we have been affected by
landscape in the past.
This is landscape that swallows up human suffering instead
of landscape of a harmonious, balanced and timeless mood. Yet, we can also feel
that this is sacred landscape and the silence does not have to be the forced
silence imposed through the censoring of history text books and the oppression
of thought by dominant economic classes…it can be a silence of deep and moving
reverence and horror for those who were abandoned by the world to inhumane and
tortuous deaths so that some could live in economic comfort at the expense of
others.
The show was curated by Seol Park of Spark Associates Art
Management and it is currently being held at O’Sullivan Antiques at 51 E. 10th
Street, New York, NY until October 15th, 2015.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.