{{{click on images to enlarge them}}}
Images courtesy of the artist and Mike Weiss Gallery
What’s your favorite western? I’ve always been partial to The Man Who Shot Liberty Valence. Shane
is up there too, along with High Noon
and The Big Country (Gregory Peck and
Chuck Heston in one huge, wide-screen, 70 millimeter epic). Western actors? My favorite is Randolph Scott – he exuded
integrity, strength and compassion. I also liked Joel McCrea and Slim Pickens a
lot. But what about that Jewish
guy? You know, the very serious looking
guy, very Brando, kind of a hipster, long hair, funky head gear…strong but
vulnerable…guy was born in Nazareth, moved to Hollywood to get work…he did some
good flicks too. In fact, his career
seems to be commemorated at the Mike Weiss Gallery these days in Jerry Kearns' show: RRRGGHH!!!
In fact, Kearns paints Jesus as one doleful looking
gunslinger. I guess he’s kind of like Shane – he wants to hang up his guns but
when you’ve got some aggressive, two-bit, red-neck peckerwood in your town,
why, women and children can’t walk down the street safely. This calls for a
Marshall, or a good-guy with a gun to take care of the bad-guy with a gun.
Actually I think Kearns is pointing out something really interesting. They did a psychological study a while ago
where two groups of people either had to read passages from the Bible or
sections from the daily newspaper. After
both groups were finished they were tested for levels of aggression. The group that had read parts of the Bible
was measured as more aggressive than the news readers. Why is religious literature so violent and bloody?
It seems that we like to use bloody allegories as symbolic tales of spiritual evolution. There’s something corrupt inside of us and it has to be confronted and violently rooted out for inner peace to reign – that seems to be a big formula for spiritual evolution. This lends itself perfectly to stories of good guys blasting bad guys to smithereens. In fact, sometimes you get the good guy, killed by the bad guy, who is then killed by the friend/son/brother of the first good guy. You see this from Osiris, to Agamemnon, to Macbeth, to the Lion King. This seems to be the allegory of allegories – the absence of goodness can only be filled again after the evil which removed it is killed. So we get a lot of revenge killing movies/stories throughout the ages.
It seems that we like to use bloody allegories as symbolic tales of spiritual evolution. There’s something corrupt inside of us and it has to be confronted and violently rooted out for inner peace to reign – that seems to be a big formula for spiritual evolution. This lends itself perfectly to stories of good guys blasting bad guys to smithereens. In fact, sometimes you get the good guy, killed by the bad guy, who is then killed by the friend/son/brother of the first good guy. You see this from Osiris, to Agamemnon, to Macbeth, to the Lion King. This seems to be the allegory of allegories – the absence of goodness can only be filled again after the evil which removed it is killed. So we get a lot of revenge killing movies/stories throughout the ages.
Of course it’s completely paradoxical. The goal of spiritual development, from what
I can tell, is a type of inner peace. When
you get real religion, you don’t get frazzled anymore. Somebody can call you an SOB and you can
smile at him. They slap you, you turn
the other cheek. Yet, the idea of
establishing ‘peace’ and kindness as a response to malice as your ultimate goal,
but accomplishing this peace by embracing stories of violence and revenge
…well, something is wrong there. If you
are spiritually complete you will probably not believe in revenge any more, yet
you embraced a story of revenge killing as a guide in your spiritual
quest? What? So I think this is one
thing Kearns might be highlighting.
It might be argued, however, that Christianity was kind
of a way (originally within the Jewish tradition) to eliminate this type of
paradox. We’ve got lots of righteous,
allegorical killings in the “Old” Testament (sometimes whole armies or cities are
destroyed) but Jesus tries to attain his goals relatively peacefully to the
point of self-sacrifice in the “New” Testament. Maybe it’s the same with Buddhism and
Hinduism. You’ve got lots of cool wars
and kidnappings and revenge killings in Hindu religious literature, but
Buddhism, which sprang from it, is all butterflies and peace signs. In Hinduism
you decapitate a demon or two and gain spiritual enlightenment, in Buddhism you
sit under a tree.
In any case, Kearns’ work is so engaging it speaks for
itself. Please check out his hilarious paintings of Jesus as a gunslinger at
Mike Weiss. Kearns seems to be poking
fun at our tendency to visualize the process of human development in violent
terms, regardless of the fact that this is so counter-productive. Even within the Christian tradition, built on
the self-destructive ethical behavior of a pacifistic Nazarene whistle-blower,
we still love watching the bad guy get his cahoonas shot off. This is probably not a good way to visualize
the path to enlightenment.
-------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------
The Byrds - Jesus is just all right with me...
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.