So, first of all, perhaps, we are compelled to wonder why,
wandering the streets with our own plastic bags of veggies and humanely killed
chickens, we might play amateur sleuth and try to discern as much about the
others on the street as possible. What are we looking for when we check people
out on the street? Why are we doing this? And yet, one might ask whether anyone
would really pay extra attention to this type of person – she is somewhat common in New York City. If
we take a closer look, however, we might see that she warrants being seen more
closely because she very well could be suffering. This type of expressionistic,
Muybridge motion study seems to reveal that this person we encounter everyday
and dismiss, perhaps, as a benign presence, a well-heeled member of the liberal,
intellectual class in New York City, may actually demand our sympathy and
fellow-feeling as well. And, of course, many of us who wander through the Lower
East Side galleries may recognize ourselves in her/them.
These women are not moving forward very decisively or
enthusiastically. We are encouraged, through our educational system, to pursue
our own excellence often to the neglect of others; has this type of person
finally left school and arrived at her long-struggled-for, beyond-reproach
niche in the Big Apple only to find it is not all that it was cracked up to be?
Perhaps all the competition and anxiety was not really worth it? Are these folks
schlepping in callous self-absorption? In liberal guilt? In longing for
something or someone lost? In self-pity? In the awareness that their lives may
have been altered or constrained due to their gender? Are they just schlepping
while thinking of nothing? Is this just neutral wandering back home with
groceries? In these periods of transition do these women reflect on the nature
of their lives or do they unconsciously betray some unspoken form of distress
while wandering home with their plastic bags of foodstuff?
These folks seem inaccessible and not inviting even though
they are not moving forward with an aggressive purpose. They seem to have
accepted things, yet they are not comfortable in this acceptance. They are
clearly showing external pressures, stresses or concerns that are not currently
present. They are preoccupied. They seem alienated from us through their hardship.
Other art writers have pointed out that these figures are a
bit gangly and awkward. These women do not conform to the golden ratio in their
body proportions and might be missing most if not all of the traits that
typically confer ‘beauty’ to a woman from the traditional male perspective.
Hahn’s work in the past has referenced the way women have been depicted
throughout the history of art – is the perceived distress of these women due to
the lack of attention these women have paid to meeting the expectations of men?
Are these women who have read ‘The Beauty Myth’ and stopped trying to conform
to some male expectations that if they are to be successful they must also
sexualize themselves as a type of compensation? Are these women who have struck
out on their own, are not trying to meet physical or beauty standards, and who
are suffering the consequences, and perhaps even surprised at themselves for
suffering these consequences? We still
live in a society where body shape and gender can determine success. It could
well be that this is the source of the discomfort in these women.
So another important aspect of Hahn’s work might be that the
history of art has been so badly tainted by negative and sexist depictions of
women, that when we see women depicted in visual art, we almost always, despite
ourselves, are forced to view them within the reference of the skewed
perspective of art history. We have a frame of reference toward the depiction
of women in art which is a distorted and sexist frame of reference and it might
affect the way we see any depiction of women in art. By this, I mean that even
a ‘neutral’ attempt at a depiction of a woman might be interpreted as either
following a harmful tradition or diverging from a harmful tradition, and not
viewed on its own terms, necessarily. Given the flawed history of the visual
arts, and the oppression of women historically, maybe Hahn is asking: Can a
woman just be a woman in a painting, with no historical baggage (ah, that’s
what might be in the plastic bags!)? Isn’t that an interesting interpretation!?
Maybe these women are figuratively carrying such baggage home with them in
these pieces.
We still live in a society where body shape, gender and
conforming to the beauty myth can determine success. It could well be that this
is the source of the discomfort in these women who walk down the street with
their expressions of apparently forlorn apathy in lieu of the excitement you
might expect for a young, independent woman in the city. But, then again, the
beauty of this show is that one is encouraged to ruminate on various
interpretations as to what is ailing these women on their way home. The show ends on the 12th.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.