{{{click on images to enlarge them}}}
When looking at a representational work of art – a piece
that represents stuff and/or illusionistic relationships between stuff in the
world - there’s a tendency to engage in a specific cognitive process that might
not allow for a meaningful experience or full engagement with the piece (Susan
Sontag, of course, wrote about this in her essay “Against Interpretation”).
There is also the tendency to resort to an easy allegorical interpretation
based on what we believe certain traditional ‘symbols’ in a piece might mean. So
if we look at Rembrandt’s “Polish Rider” at the Frick we might verbalize
something to ourselves like: “The horse in this painting is clearly a symbol of
the means of transition from one state of being to another.” In this case one’s
engagement with the piece seems sorely limited through that process of analysis,
realization and verbalization. The purpose of abstraction was, in part, to
subvert this interpretive proclivity and allow the viewer to be more deeply
engaged through forms and colors and the relationships between them. That was
the theory anyway.
The work of Ray Bull at Ana Cristea Gallery openly impugns
the autonomy of abstraction. In the notes accompanying the show it is stated
that, “Ray Bull’s paintings speak to the impossibility of abstraction in
painting. His compositions consistently straddle the line between
representation and abstraction.” So basically Bull seems to be implying that
when you look at a work of abstraction, in order to get anything from it, you
engage in, basically, the same thought-processes that you use for a
representational piece.
Abstraction is allegory by another name in which you
bring the same preconceptions and pre-existing beliefs to the work as you do
with representational pieces and subject it to analysis. There is no way to
move beyond this analytical process and to believe there is a way to be
affected by abstraction without cognitive analysis becomes tantamount to
believing, a la Carl David Friedrich, that staring at mountains long enough
will integrate you into nature and help you feel the true Christian God. Being
directly engaged, without analysis, by a piece of abstraction, is a myth.
Ray Bull also, in his pieces, seems to take this argument
one step further. He seems to want to get at the source of our capacity to
verbalize meaning and how a type of destructive interpretive feedback loop can
be created through this process. If I look at a work of abstraction and can
analyze it, it is due to the relationship and effect of the various elements in
the painting. It seems that the awareness of the relationships between colors
and forms and their effects then inevitably leads to a need to articulate or
verbalize which then destroys any further capacity for direct engagement.
Once one becomes ‘aware’ of what the piece is
doing, or how a piece affects one, the real meaning of the piece is destroyed.
Indeed, the tension between abstraction and representation in Bull’s pieces
points to the fact that in the very process of creation of abstraction, if
analysis occurs by the artist, true abstraction is destroyed. In attempting to
create an abstract piece analysis of the relationships between colors and forms
will, however, occur and, of necessity, the piece will lose its vitality and
potential for engagement and merely invite a limited cognitive interpretation
from the viewer.
So Bull’s pieces show abstraction in its flawed reality.
Yet, Bull could also be pointing to the fact that a ‘real’ type of abstraction
might be possible. By extension we can guess that if an artist chooses pure,
unadulterated improvisation, true abstraction might be possible and true
engagement of the viewer might occur. Yet, Bull could also be saying that in
the deliberate choice of improvising there is also analysis and planning, which
would then militate against the ultimate goal.
Ray Bull
Get Up With It
June 18 – July 17,2015
Ana Cristea Gallery
521 West 26th Street
New York, NY 10001
Daniel Gauss
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.